Browse data: Studies
From Copyright EVIDENCE
Choose a category:
- Studies (909)
Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.
Bandinelli, C. (1) ·
Deazley, R. (1) ·
European Union Intellectual Property Office (1) ·
Frye, B. (1) ·
Graham, R. (1) ·
Intellectual Property Office (2) ·
Karaganis, J. (1) ·
McRobbie, A. (1) ·
Office of Harmonization in the Internal Market (1) ·
Runge, F. L. (1) ·
Ryan, C. (1) ·
Schofield, B. L. (1) ·
Springer, B. (1) ·
Strutt, D. (1) ·
Urban, J. M. (1) ·
Wallace, A. (1) ·
Zerkee, J. (1)
Albitz (2013) (1) ·
BASCAP (2011) (1) ·
Carroll (2006) (1) ·
European Observatory on Infringement of IPRs (2015) (1) ·
Horava (2010) (1) ·
Hunter (2005) (1) ·
Jaszi (2010) (1) ·
Julien et al. (2013) (1) ·
Litman (2006) (1) ·
Malossi (2002) (1) ·
Margolis (2013) (1) ·
Menell (2000) (1) ·
OHIM (2013b) (1) ·
Schesinger et al (2015) (1)
I21: Analysis of Education (1) ·
I23: Higher Education • Research Institutions (1) ·
K0: General (1) ·
K11: Property Law (1) ·
K42: Illegal Behavior and the Enforcement of Law (3) ·
K4: Legal Procedure; the Legal System; and Illegal Behavior (1) ·
K: Law and Economics (1) ·
M37: Advertising (1) ·
O30: General (1) ·
O34: Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital (9) ·
O38: Government Policy (2) ·
O3: Technological Change • Research and Development • Intellectual Property Rights (2) ·
Other (10)
Case Study (1) ·
Focus Groups (1) ·
Participant Observation (2) ·
Qualitative Collection Methods (8) ·
Qualitative content/text mining (1) ·
Quantitative Collection Methods (6) ·
Quantitative data/text mining (2) ·
Semi-Structured Interview (4) ·
Structured Interview (2) ·
Survey Research (qualitative; e.g. consumer preferences) (6) ·
Survey Research (quantitative; e.g. sales/income reporting) (2) ·
Web analytic (online user trace data) (2)
2012 (1) ·
2012-2016 (1) ·
2013 (1) ·
2014-2016 (1) ·
2015 (3) ·
2016 (1) ·
March 2016 – July 2016 (1) ·
Six weeks from 29 May to 10 July 2015 (1) ·
The survey response period ran from January 2015 to August 2015. Follow-up and reminder correspondence was sent electronically to this same law journal sample in March 2015 and August 2015. (1)
1. Relationship between protection (subject matter/term/scope) and supply/economic development/growth/welfare (5) ·
2. Relationship between creative process and protection - what motivates creators (e.g. attribution; control; remuneration; time allocation)? (1) ·
3. Harmony of interest assumption between authors and publishers (creators and producers/investors) (1) ·
4. Effects of protection on industry structure (e.g. oligopolies; competition; economics of superstars; business models; technology adoption) (3) ·
5. Understanding consumption/use (e.g. determinants of unlawful behaviour; user-generated content; social media) (8)
A. Nature and Scope of exclusive rights (hyperlinking/browsing; reproduction right) (1) ·
B. Exceptions (distinguish innovation and public policy purposes; open-ended/closed list; commercial/non-commercial distinction) (2) ·
C. Mass digitisation/orphan works (non-use; extended collective licensing) (1) ·
D. Licensing and Business models (collecting societies; meta data; exchanges/hubs; windowing; crossborder availability) (3) ·
E. Fair remuneration (levies; copyright contracts) (1) ·
F. Enforcement (quantifying infringement; criminal sanctions; intermediary liability; graduated response; litigation and court data; commercial/non-commercial distinction; education and awareness) (7)
Creative, arts and entertainment (3) ·
Cultural education (1) ·
Film and motion pictures (2) ·
Libraries, archives, museums and other cultural activities (2) ·
PR and communication (1) ·
Photographic activities (2) ·
Programming and broadcasting (1) ·
Publishing of books, periodicals and other publishing (3) ·
Software publishing (1) ·
Sound recording and music publishing (1)
Showing below up to 10 results in range #1 to #10.
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
E
F
G
I
I cont.
M
O
U