Heredia-Carroza, Palma and Aguado (2023)

From Copyright EVIDENCE

Advertising Architectural Publishing of books, periodicals and other publishing Programming and broadcasting Computer programming Computer consultancy Creative, arts and entertainment Cultural education Libraries, archives, museums and other cultural activities

Film and motion pictures Sound recording and music publishing Photographic activities PR and communication Software publishing Video game publishing Specialised design Television programmes Translation and interpretation

1. Relationship between protection (subject matter/term/scope) and supply/economic development/growth/welfare 2. Relationship between creative process and protection - what motivates creators (e.g. attribution; control; remuneration; time allocation)? 3. Harmony of interest assumption between authors and publishers (creators and producers/investors) 4. Effects of protection on industry structure (e.g. oligopolies; competition; economics of superstars; business models; technology adoption) 5. Understanding consumption/use (e.g. determinants of unlawful behaviour; user-generated content; social media)

A. Nature and Scope of exclusive rights (hyperlinking/browsing; reproduction right) B. Exceptions (distinguish innovation and public policy purposes; open-ended/closed list; commercial/non-commercial distinction) C. Mass digitisation/orphan works (non-use; extended collective licensing) D. Licensing and Business models (collecting societies; meta data; exchanges/hubs; windowing; crossborder availability) E. Fair remuneration (levies; copyright contracts) F. Enforcement (quantifying infringement; criminal sanctions; intermediary liability; graduated response; litigation and court data; commercial/non-commercial distinction; education and awareness)

Source Details

Heredia-Carroza, Palma and Aguado (2023)
Title: Does copyright understand intangible heritage? The case of flamenco in Spain
Author(s): Heredia-Carroza, J., Palma, L., Aguado, L. F.
Year: 2023
Citation: Heredia-Carroza, J., Palma, L., Aguado, L.F. (2023) Does copyright understand intangible heritage? The case of flamenco in Spain, International Journal of Heritage Studies, 29:6, 598-614.
Link(s): Definitive
Key Related Studies:
Discipline:
Linked by:
About the Data
Data Description: The first set of data was collected through interviews with 15 flamenco and Spanish music experts that could explain flamenco’s most important characteristics, and the “intervening agents and their contributions”. Second, online surveys were completed by Flamenco spectators and experts, in order to provide observations and opinions on such explained characteristics and intervening agents. Third, through exploratory factor and structural equation modelling analyses, the authors provided data on the impact of Flamenco’s perceived value.
Data Type: Primary data
Secondary Data Sources:
Data Collection Methods:
Data Analysis Methods:
Industry(ies):
Country(ies):
Cross Country Study?: No
Comparative Study?: No
Literature review?: No
Government or policy study?: No
Time Period(s) of Collection:
  • 2017 (for the surveys)
Funder(s):
  • Ayudas para la Recualificación del Sistema Universitario Español en su Modalidad Margarita Salas

Abstract

“This paper illustrates the gap between the perceived value of performer input in intangible heritage and how it is considered in the market, drawing on a large sample of flamenco in Spain. The method used is constructed from four different components: an analysis of the intellectual property legal framework to determine the scope of copyright and neighbouring rights, interviews with experts to explain in detail the flamenco work creation process, double system surveys to determine the perceived evaluation of its agents and contributions, and finally – through a multidimensional structural equations model – flamenco work’s perceived value-scale is validated through three dimensions: composition elements, feelings, and virtuosity. The results show how the perceived value of flamenco production critically depends on the externalisation accomplished by the performer through virtuosity. Nevertheless, copyright or royalties by no means ensure a level of protection that aligns with the key creative role of flamenco performers”.

Main Results of the Study

The authors show in an empirical way that copyright regulations do not protect the value that creative agents perceive when working with a certain art. In particular, with regard to an intangible heritage such as Flamenco, it would be important to take into consideration the audience perception, since this dance, identified as a shared practice, entails active listening, sense of community and history. This was rendered pretty clear thanks to the use of structural equation models that demonstrate how the virtuosity aspect, which is identified as an externality produced by the performer, “is the essential distinguishable element in flamenco work’s value”.

Policy Implications as Stated By Author

Although authors do not explicitly address policy implications, there is the underlining idea according to which the externalisation that the Flamenco performer accomplishes should be protected by copyright or through royalties system to reflect such important value.



Coverage of Study

Coverage of Fundamental Issues
Issue Included within Study
Relationship between protection (subject matter/term/scope) and supply/economic development/growth/welfare
Relationship between creative process and protection - what motivates creators (e.g. attribution; control; remuneration; time allocation)?
Green-tick.png
Harmony of interest assumption between authors and publishers (creators and producers/investors)
Effects of protection on industry structure (e.g. oligopolies; competition; economics of superstars; business models; technology adoption)
Understanding consumption/use (e.g. determinants of unlawful behaviour; user-generated content; social media)
Coverage of Evidence Based Policies
Issue Included within Study
Nature and Scope of exclusive rights (hyperlinking/browsing; reproduction right)
Green-tick.png
Exceptions (distinguish innovation and public policy purposes; open-ended/closed list; commercial/non-commercial distinction)
Mass digitisation/orphan works (non-use; extended collective licensing)
Licensing and Business models (collecting societies; meta data; exchanges/hubs; windowing; crossborder availability)
Fair remuneration (levies; copyright contracts)
Enforcement (quantifying infringement; criminal sanctions; intermediary liability; graduated response; litigation and court data; commercial/non-commercial distinction; education and awareness)

Datasets

{{{Dataset}}}